Thursday, September 9, 2010
Prompt #5
Prompt #4
Prompt #3
Prompt #2
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Prompt #1
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Journal Article- May
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Manipulative Blog
Monday, April 26, 2010
Reflection on Errors.
Technology Blog
Monday, March 22, 2010
March Journal Articles
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Video Analysis #2
This activity was about students starting with graphs and they make up stories that go along with each graph. Then they have to present the stories that they created to the class. The students had to learn about the different parts of the graphs in order to tell their stories. They were also learning how to do functions while doing word problems. The teacher helps them out in their groups when they are doing their word problems. She goes around to each group and answers the questions that they have.
Question 1- Lesson Analysis #2: Describe what the teacher does to support learning while students are working groups
While the students are working in groups the teacher is walking around and make sure they are understanding. When the students came up with the wrong answer the teacher said "Lets re-read the question" they were on the right track they were just interpretting the question wrong. They ended up coming up with the right answer to the question without the teacher helping them. One group did not get the answer and the teacher broke the question down and said "What am I looking for?" Next, she said "Lets look at week one." She was breaking down the problem in to steps so that the students could figure out the first step and then be able to figure out the rest of the problem with out the teacher doing the whole problem for them.
Question 2- Reflective Task #2: Describe how the teachers questioning, and the manner in which the student responses are handled, contribute or do not contribute to a positive classroom learning environment?
The teacher asks a question then lets the students answer, then she will ask another question based on the answer that the students just gave. She wanted to know what the students had already figured out in the problem and then try and challenge them with a new question. When the student answers she says "Oh you are so great!" and then asks if he can explain his answer. She is encouraging her students to answer because she is so enthusiastic about it what they are saying. Then she goes on to the next part and asks students how she would write this part of the problem and they tell her how to do it. She is discussing each step of the problem and making sure that the students are understanding.
Question 3- Reflective Task #1 Describe the nature of the evidence of student learning, e.g. answers, explanations, questions. etc.
You can tell that the student was learning because she went in front of the whole class and correctly explained the solution to the problem. One student answers the question wrong and then she asks where did you get that from and tries to lead the student on the right track. After she asks the student a couple more questions he explains his reasoning and is on the right track. The students are explaining the way they are coming up with the answers which shows that they are understanding the problems that they are learning. The teacher is constantly asking questions so that the students have to answer and explain how they are coming up with each answer and the other students need to understand. She tries to ask different questions to get him to go in to even more detail to explain how he came up with each answer.
Reflection
I thought that the way this teacher used questioning was very effective. She also used a lot of discussion for each problem that the students needed to figure out. She talks to the whole group of students but switches off on what students she's calling on. I did not like how there were so many videos of the same thing going on. It would have been better if it was one long video of different kids answering questions to figure out the problems. I liked how this teacher was so enthuisastic I think that it made the students more interested in trying to figure out the problems.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Math Applet #2- Grades 6-8 Fractions- Adding
Math Applet #1- Grades 6-8 Money
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
February Journal #2
February Journal #1
Dubon, L.P. & Shafer, K.G. (2010). Storyboards for meaningful patterns. Teaching Children Mathematics. pp 325-329.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Review of two PBLs
PBL #1 Lounging Around Summary
I thought that the problem of this PBL related to the students a lot and that they would be interesting in solving it. Even though the PBL is math based it incorporates science, language arts, social science and fine arts. The day to day schedule was in depth and related to the question. The guiding questions seem very helpful and applicable to the seventh and eighth grade students. The PBL is very step by step and detailed for each activity that the students have to complete. The minilessons really related to the main topic of the PBL and I think that the students would want to complete them. The students are not just completing worksheets everyday one day there was a speaker and another day they used magazines and computers to look for designs. There was a lot of technology and connections being made through out this PBL.
PBL # 2 Hawaiian School Carnival Summary
This PBL was about a carnival fundraiser that the students were participating in to get 30 new computers, educational software, and a smart board. The PBL had activities that incorporated safety to building things like a playground. There was lessons that incorporating scaling in to the lesson which would be very useful to the math and geography. The lesson on the budget and comparing prices was very helpful and I think that they could be applied a lot to real life. You will have use these things in everyday life. The presentation day the students were presenting blue prints, graphs, figures, and models. There were a lot of strong connections being made in this PBL.
2. PBL #1 Strengths and Weakness
There are many strengths to this PBL because it incorporates many different subjects that relate to the topic. The activities in this PBL are very engaging and the students will want to do them because it directly relates to them. This PBL does not just focus on part of the activity it goes into all the aspects of creating the lounge. The weakness of this is that there is not a lot of reasoning and proof of why the students are doing what they are doing. I think that the creator of this PBL could have done a better job of making the students prove why they are doing each activity.
PBL #2 Strengths and Weakness
I did not find a lot of strengths to this PBL. The activities were really well explained and went along with the subject but they did not seem that exciting for the students to participate in. I thought that the topic could have related more to the students. I do not think the students would be really interesting in having a fund raiser. The creator of the PBL said that the it used higher level thinking but I did not see very much of it when going through and reading it. The guiding questions are not organized and kind of random and most of them did not really relate to the topic.
3. Compare and Contrast the two PBLs.
The first PBL was very well organized and well thought out. I thought the topic and activities were very interesting to the students that were participating in them. There was a new activity almost everyday unless there was a work day where students were continuing to work on a project. The objectives seemed to relate to the assessments. The second PBL activities did not seem to relate to the topics. I did not like the PBL problem to begin with but maybe the students would have been interested in having the carnival. This PBL also seemed very unorganized. The connections that they were trying to make did not really connect to the topic.
4. Critique The Strengths and Weaknesses- Give Examples
The justifying the budget and the guest speaker were the activities that I thought were very interesting for the first PBL. The budget activity would really help students in the future not only for this PBL but for real life situations. There is also an activity about measuring the room and making the model that I think would be useful for math that the students would have to continue to do in the future.
The second PBL had a lot of the same activities as the first one did that I thought were beneficial like the budget lesson plan. Another activity that I thought was useful was the geometry/measurement lesson plan. One of the weaknesses of this PBL was the probability lesson plan. It did not seem that interesting to students and did not relate to the topic of the PBL.
5. Math Focus
I think that math is the main focus of both of these PBLs. Both of the PBLs have a lot of interesting activities that have interesting and engaging ways of focusing on math and other curriculum areas. The first PBL incorporates a lot of algebra and geometry, which I think is very beneficial to the students. There is also simple math like having a budget that would be helpful to students. There are also a lot of graphs that the first PBL uses where students have to analyze and apply data. The second PBL the students had to use graphs, determine areas, and make a scale drawing. Both PBLs were very math centered had a lot of interesting math activities.
6. Assessment
There were many different forms of assessment in both of the PBLs. The main assessment that I saw were worksheets, rubrics, and checklists. I think that both PBL assessments matched up with the standards that were listed. In the end the PBLs were interesting and new ways to teach students things that related to them. They would have learned a lot more from these PBL's then they would have learned from just having a lecture or completing a worksheet.
Problem Based Learning- Journal
2. I think that there were a lot of strengths to this article because it gave examples for each step that the teacher did for PBL. There was also a part of the article that had student comments and the students responded that they really liked the PBL. I also think that it was interesting that they incorporated the constructivist theory into this type of learning. The part of the article about splitting the students into groups based on their leadership abilities and creative abilities was new to me because no other article I read talked about how teachers actually put their students into groups. The article could have given more information on what the teachers did to prepare for creating a PBL problem. The author makes it sound like it was given to them it did not explain the thought process of the teachers when creating a problem. Also the article could have gone in to more detail about the role of the teacher during the PBL process.
3. Siefert, E.H. & Simmons, D. (1997). Learning centered schools using a problem-based approach. National Association of Secondary School Principals. 81, 90-97.
Problem Based Learning (PBL)
Friday, January 29, 2010
Article- Aiming for Understanding: Lessons learned about writing mathematics
Ward, J. D. (2005). Aiming for understanding: Lessons learned about writing
mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics 12 (4), 192-199.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Process Standard- Communication
Video Analysis #1
Friday, January 22, 2010
"Provoking Intellectual Need" By Kien H. Lim
This article talked about how students need an intellectual need or internal drive to solve problems. It gives teachers ideas on how to create an internal drive for students when teaching mathematical ideas or concepts. Lim makes it clear that teachers might just teach the information that is going to be on the standardized tests. He states in his article “Although tasks should engage students and align with assessments, they should also cause students to grapple with the mathematics that we want them to learn” (Lim, 2009). I agree with Lim I think that teachers need to make their lessons engaging but at the same time they have to still meet the states standards.
The next part of the article is about the need for prime factorization and least common multiple. There were helpful visuals in the article that helped explain to the reader how to make these concepts interesting when teaching them. It shows the order that the students should go in when completing the problems so that the students could connect what they just did in the first problem to the next problem.
According to Lim “The purpose of an intellectual-need-provoking task is to allow students to use their existing knowledge to, solve a problem, feel challenged because of the limitation of their existing knowledge, and experience the need for the target knowledge to solve the problem” (Lim 2009). I think that this is a vital part to teaching students mathematics. Teachers need to be aware of their student’s prior knowledge so that they are not overwhelming them and that their students are not falling behind. I think that students give up easily when doing math problems, which is why teachers need to have engaging ideas. If teachers do this then their student’s will not be discouraged but excited to learn.
Lim, K. H. (2009). Provoking intellectual need. Mathematics teaching in the middle school
15(2), 92-99.
The Learning Principle
The learning principle explained how students need to learn mathematics through understanding. Today many students are not learning mathematics because they don’t understand it; they are just memorizing the facts and numbers. Students who understand mathematics are able to use it in other subjects and can apply it in different places by the connections that they have made from prior knowledge and new knowledge.
The article also talks about using math in every day life. Children are interested in math concepts when they are younger. They like patterns and shapes and even learn these concepts before they have entered school. Teachers need to take hands on experiences and make math exciting for children to learn and understand. The article states that social interaction can be used to promote the recognition of connections among ideas and the reorganization of knowledge (NCTM, 2004). I agree with this article because I do not think that making kids memorize facts necessarily means that they understand them. I feel that this goes along with what we talked about in class. How teachers still use timed-tests even though research has proved that they are not effective.